91: This Means War (oy vey)

This Means War – February 17, 2012
Starring: Tom Hardy, Chris Pine, Reese Witherspoon, Chelsea Handler
Written by: Timothy Dowling, Simon Kinberg
Directed by: McG

The plot: “Two top CIA operatives wage an epic battle against one another after they discover they are dating the same woman.” – IMDB

My thoughts: For as much as I generally enjoy the three stars of this movie, God was it a bore. Predictable, slightly misogynistic, verging on being offensive and inappropriate. And I know, what fun am I? It’s just a movie! But why do movies get a free pass to be so…awful?

I get it, it’s all about a girl trying to figure out which guy she wants and which is better for her. Meanwhile, the two friends have to love the girl to grow and change. Tale as old as time. And I get it, they’re spies so of course there are going to be spy jokes which just end up being doorways to saying “Ooh, look at two hot guys stalk the girl they like. It’s fine because they’re spies!” but on some level, it’s weird. Sometimes, the level of absurdity doesn’t help out what’s actually happening.

I won’t analyze it in terms of gender roles, it’s not that kind of movie (but honestly, watch it and check out how masculinity vs femininity is played out. Come on Hollywood, why must you keep perpetuating these stereotypes?)

It was rarely funny, the action sequences were so-so, and I didn’t feel a connection to any of the characters. I also feel extremely dissatisfied with the ending. Tuck didn’t really get what he wanted meanwhile FDR (which, let me state for the record that if I met a guy who went by the name FDR, I would either a.) tell him to fuck off or b.) demand he give me a real name. His real name is Franklin. What’s so terrible about that or Frank? What kind of douchebag goes by all three of his initials which just so happen to be the monniker of a famous U.S. President?) was like “check out how charming I am. Now that I’ve met this one single girl who doesn’t crumble on our first meeting (but the second meeting, yes) I guess I’m over my womanizing ways!”

Guh, I just felt so bored during this movie. The acting was fine – I think Reese is cute and Tom and Chris made for a cute spy/best friend team. Chelsea Handler was…Chelsea Handler. And that’s it. So lackluster. The plot was, for all intents and purposes, boring and overused.

*

P.S. What the hell was Angela Bassett doing in this movie? Girl, you were nominated for an Oscar.

84: Nurse Betty

Nurse Betty – September 8, 2000
Starring: Renee Zellweger, Morgan Freeman, Chris Rock, Greg Kinnear, Aaron Eckhart
Written by: John C. Richards, James Flamberg
Directed by: Neil LaBute

The plot: “Comedy about a widow’s post-traumatic obsession with a soap star.” – IMDB

My thoughts: Nurse Betty was…okay. Truly, it was just okay. There weren’t really any highlights nor any lowlights. I guess the closest thing to highlights would be Chris Rock, Allison Janney, and Crispin Glover. To me, Chris Rock is one of the best things in life. I watch Dogma twice a year for him, Alan Rickman, and Jason Mewes. And Allison Janney is Allison Janney and she doesn’t have enough screen time for any sane person’s satisfaction.

Nurse Betty follows Renee “Sour Face” Zellweger from Kansas (yes, very obvious Wizard of Oz reference) all the way to dazzling Los Angeles, California. In Kansas, her asshole husband (Eckhart) is scalped and killed (it’s all very comedic, fear not) by Rock and Freeman while Zellweger looks on, unseen and unknown. A soap opera plays in the background and in some weird post-tramautic daze, she becomes delusional that she is one of character’s (Kinnear) ex-fiancees and she has to win him back. And so begins our tale.

The issue is, the movie reads like a wanna-be Quentin Tarantino or Coen brothers flick – maybe a hybrid of the two. It’s this messy, zany, sort of off-the-wall dark comedy with quirky characters with lots of references and light action sequences. The thing is, LaBute and the team behind Nurse Betty just don’t pull it off as well as the people they’re so obviously drawing from.

Everyone is pretty good in his or her roles and the chemistry is fine. However, and I might get destroyed online because of this, I rarely care for Morgan Freeman in any of his roles because he’s just always Morgan Freeman. Plus, the dynamic between his character and Zellweger’s Betty manages to be completely unbelievable in an already unbelievable movie. I can buy most of the absurdity in the film, but Freeman’s character seems so weird and forced that it just kind of killed it for me.

It had its entertaining moments but all in all, it just fell kind of flat for me. The supporting characters stood out more to me and I think the script could have benefited from a re-write or consultation from someone who does the style better.

Stars: 2.5/5

80: Slither

Slither – March 31, 2006
Starring: Nathan Fillion, Elizabeth Banks, , Tania Saulnier
Written and directed by: James Gunn

The plot: “A small town is taken over by an alien plague, turning residents into zombies and all forms of mutant monsters.” – IMDB

My thoughts: How it’s taken me six years to see this movie is beyond me. Actually, I’m fairly certain I rented it when it first came out and for whatever reason, didn’t watch it. Either way, I’m glad I watched it at this point as I fully appreciated the campiness, the movie references, and a youthful Nathan Fillion so very, very much.

Slither is equal parts disgusting and hilarious. It’s such a strange variety of body horror – worm/leech things jumping in people’s mouths, killing them for a second, and then turning them into zombie things that spit acid at you. Too good. Factor in some dude turning into a squid, impregnating a lady who blows up to the side of a barn and explodes open during birth? That’s a winner for me right there.

I’m such a big fan of horror movies that are almost self-aware or at the very least, play into horror movie cliches in a smart way. And Slither definitely does that. Let’s just go ahead and look at some of the movies it references (not outwardly. No one says, “Hey! It’s like Rosemary’s Baby, get it?!”):

– The family’s name is Cassavetes. The actor who played Guy in Rosemary’s Baby is John Cassavetes
– One of the shops is owned by R.J. MacReady, the name of Kurt Russell in The Thing.
– The bathtub scene from A Nightmare on Elm Street is recreated
– Serenity grenade reference!

Honestly, there are a ton more that even I didn’t get. Either way, it’s totally a movie for movie/pop culture buffs. Hence why I liked it so much.

It was really enjoyable – not perfect so I won’t give it a perfect score, but I did really like it all the same.

Stars: 4/5

78: Wanderlust

Wanderlust – February 24, 2012
Starring: Paul Rudd, Jennifer Aniston, Justin Theroux
Written by: David Wain, Ken Marino
Directed by: David Wain

The plot: “Rattled by sudden unemployment, a Manhattan couple surveys alternative living options, ultimately deciding to experiment with living on a rural commune where free love rules.” – IMDB

My thoughts: Stop what you are doing and go see this movie. Don’t wait for a download online. Don’t wait for it to be on DVD/Blu-Ray. Go fork over the money and see this.

If you like anything involving the following, you need to see it:

– Stella
– David Wain
– Ken Marino
– Michael Ian Black
– Michael Showalter
– Paul Rudd
– things that are funny

I haven’t laughed so hard at a movie in…I feel like the correct frame of time is “ever” although it might have been equivalent with Death at a Funeral. I don’t know how, but this movie managed to surpass Wet Hot American Summer in terms of hilarity and awesome.

All I have to say is: the Paul Rudd talking to himself in the mirror scene. Absolutely lost it. And the reference to my favorite viral video at the end.

Seriously. Go see this movie. And if you don’t like it, I don’t want to know you.

Stars: 8 million/5

72: Friends with Kids

Friends with Kids – March 9, 2012
Starring: Adam Scott, Jennifer Westfeldt, Maya Rudolph, Chris O’Dowd, Kristen Wigg, Jon Hamm
Written and directed by: Jennifer Westfeldt

The plot: “Two best friends decide to have a child together while keeping their relationship platonic, so they can avoid the toll kids can take on romantic relationships.” – IMDB

My thoughts: So, I’m more than a little in love with Adam Scott so how could I say no to this? HOW?! The answer is, of course, “Kaitie, you can’t say no to it!” So I didn’t.

And it was okay. It was somewhat funny, somewhat heartwarming, somewhat romantic, somewhat everything. The acting was good – not sure anyone really had to step outside of their comfort zones for their roles, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

I laughed most at Adam Scott’s parts because frankly, I find him to be delightfully hilarious and has such wonderful comedic timing. And I actually enjoyed Kristen Wiig as being the woman who married an asshole – it was a bit more dramatic than she usually plays and it was nice to see that she wasn’t too shabby at that.

My biggest fault with the movie is that it ends in a predictable, romantic cliche. For once, I want to see Hollywood end a movie that isn’t perfectly happy, where not everyone gets everything they want. Sometimes, people get screwed over and that’s life. I’m going to spoil this movie, but really, it isn’t too spoilery because if you can’t see the end coming from a mile away then you need to become more well-versed in the land of film.

So, basically, Julie (Westfeldt) and Jason (Scott) are the best of friends. And they decide to have a kid together and just remain best friends and raise the kid. Inevitably, Julie falls in love with Jason, thus proving the whole Harry and Sally thing right. Thanks, Hollywood. And then Jason makes a big speech about how he loves Julie, which she takes as a mutual feeling but he really just meant he loves her a lot as a best friend. This breaks Julie’s heart and she has to move away. But a few months later, Jason miraculously realizes that *gasp* he does love Julie romantically and they end up together and probably with another child.

The thing that’s shitty is that Jason’s rejection of Julie felt really honest and real. He seemed genuinely taken aback and showed little inclination to try at a romantic relationship with her. To me, the ending seemed like a totally, happily-ever-after cop-out. The movie did a pretty good job of dealing with life rather than focusing on romantic-comedy situations. It was pretty honest right up until that last part. And it let me down.

It was enjoyable – I absolutely laughed out loud a few times and as a hormonal young woman, I was happy to see the girl get the guy at the end, but my inner critic was not so happy with that.

Stars: 3/5

57: I Don’t Know How She Does It

I Don’t Know How She Does It – September 16, 2011
Starring: Sarah Jessica Parker, Greg Kinnear, Pierce Brosnan, Olivia Munn, Christina Hendricks
Written by: Aline Brosh McKenna
Directed by: Douglas McGrath

The plot: “A comedy centered on the life of Kate Reddy, a finance executive who is the breadwinner for her husband and two kids.” – IMDB

Welcome all of my lovely readers to the first live blog at threesixfivefilm. The film to be reviewed (and subsequently torn apart)? I Don’t Know How She Does It starring Carrie Bradshaw Sarah Jessica Parker. Read along while you watch if you feel like subjecting yourself what is probably one of the worst movies of the year.

@ 00:50 – Christina Hendricks is gushing about how ah-maaaaah-zing SJP is. How did I never realize how annoying Christina’s voice is? It doesn’t sound like this on Mad Men, does it?

@ 03:52 – After a hard day’s work, SJP claims “not too tired for you to put it in, Greg Kinnear.” Why do I foresee her being asleep when Greg returns to the room?

@ 04:07 – SJP is asleep. Predictable.

@ 06:25 – SJP’s daughter is a little brat who can’t accept that her mom works and travels. ONLY CARTOONS CAN SATIATE SUCH HATRED.

@ 06:37 – Cute to Christina still gushing in interview/documentary form. Am confused; what kind of movie is this? A mockumentary? A documentary? Is this just the style the director chose? Does Christina single white female the shit out of SJP in the end? That would make this next hour and a half worth it.

@ 08:10 – Oh, they have a nanny! And I’m supposed to be stunned that she somehow “does it all” when she leaves her kids alone for…9-10 hours a day? I think I know how she does it.

@ 10:11 – Busy Phillips sighting. This movie just got not completely entirely horrible.

@ 11:11 – Okay, so apparently there are these things called “Momsters” and they move in slo-mo and…is this a not funny Mean Girls 20 years later? I rescind my previous comment; the movie remains horrible.

@ 12:10 – SJP is trying to tell her boss (Frasier Krane) why she’s late. Despite having a lot of pretty top notch lies (or just telling him to fuck off), she chooses to say “mammogram.” Ah, nothing like a little “Well, I might have cancer,” lie to get the boss off your back!

@ 13:48 – SETH MEYERS? Why are good people in this movie? Greg, Busy, and Seth. I am completely astounded.

@ 14:50 – Enter Seth Meyers as the mega-douche commenting on double standards and how the shininess of shoes between sexes is a double standard. (Apparently people really care about the shine of a man’s shoe but a woman’s can be covered in horse shit. Who cares!) I can’t figure out if this movie is full of misogyny, misandry, or just hate for all humans everywhere.

@ 15:40 – SJP gets to go meet with some fancy corporate head person (Pierce Brosnan) in NY! You’re perfect! You have a job and two kids…and a nanny and an assistant and loads of money!!!

@ 16:13 – I guess Olivia Munn is the uptight, work-is-the-only-thing-that-matters, I’m-a-robot assistant. Come on, this trope? Really?

@ 19:19 – New York establishing montage scenes, as is customary in every movie!

@ 20:42 – SJP itching her head? Claims “stress eczema.” Bitch, you got lice!

@ 22:10 – Text to SJP’s phone “Emily SNT home with LICE. Whole family must b treated.” I’m just saying – either I am a psychic or this movie is painfully predictable.

@ 25:17 – Busy Phillips throwing shade at SJP for her kids getting lice because they’re dirty. Come on, B, what kind of mom are you? Lice are typically more attracted to lean hair.

@ 25:48 – Holy shit, they’re walking into a store called Lice Enders. can this be real? Are there entire (what looks to be) salons devoted to the removal of lice?

@ 34:34 – Late nights with the new partner/friend/whatever? Pierce Brosnan, I think you’re about to have a raging hard-on for SJP.

@ 38:30 – MONTAGE!

@ 39:30 – SJP and Greg symbolically watching His Girl Friday. Oh I get it, SJP is torn between just being a mom/wife or having a career.

@ 41:15 – Pierce Brosnan signing e-mails XO.

@ 42:40 – Oh God, Olivia Munn is pregnant and wants to abort it, but not before SJP guilt trips her with a Carrie Bradshaw-worthy speech about how amazing being a mom is. Is this going to turn into a right-wing, anti-abortion movie?

@ 46:20 – Oh, dig at Cleveland and it’s lack of famous sites from Pierce Brosnan. Good one – THERE’S THE ROCK HALL AND OTHER STUFF, YOU DICK.

@ 47:00 – Pierce and SJP go bowling. “See? We’re real people! We’re not just Wall Streeters or whatever, we stick our fingers in balls and wear stinky, ugly shoes, too! Just like you guys!”

@ 51:10 – SJP trying to make plans now that her project is calming down? Sorry, girl, you about to get slammed and Greg Kinnear will not be pleased.

@ 51:55 – Surprise! Olivia Munn is having the baby. But that doesn’t mean she’s suddenly all touchy-feely! Only about the baby.

@ 52:33 – “Being pregnant doesn’t feel awesome. Feels like a mistake. But lots of people have babies as mistakes.” Perfect. Perfect way of looking at your pregnancy. This won’t have any negative repercussions (well, probably not in the movie but in real life? Loads.)

@ 58:00 – Uh oh, something’s come up and you have to get to a meeting on Thanksgiving. Family or job? Job! But don’t worry. In 35 more minutes, I’ll figure out a way to balance the two out and we’ll all have learned a valuable lesson.

@ 1:02:51 – Pierce almost just told SJP he loves her. Quelle surprise!

@ 1:04:10 – Okay, so Olivia Munn is trying to tell SJP that Pierce is going to take all of the credit for their project, but he insists she join him at a lunch with the investor (or something) because they’re a team. And yet, Olivia Munn doesn’t get invited because what did she do except all the research!

@ 1:09:00 – Everything is going perfectly at work but at home, oh her life is crumbling down around her. You have to forgive me, Greg. You have to forgive me. You have forgive me. You have to. You have to forgive me Greg. Greg, you have to forgive me.

@ 1:11:11 – You know, it might be wrong of me to say but SJP has way more in common and way more chemistry with Pierce Brosnan. Maybe she should just…get with him? He’s a refined gentleman and dat accent!

@ 1:12:30 – Holy Christ, is SJP a grown-up manic pixie dream girl to Pierce Brosnan’s cynical loner?

@ 1:13:40 – “Reasons it’s okay if I don’t work at Edwin-Morgan-Forrester anymore…because trying to be a man is a waste of a woman.” I can’t. I can’t even.

@ 1:15:30 – So, I told my boss I couldn’t be as available as he hoped and he said it was okay. Ha, bet things would have been a bit easier if I had just done that to begin with. Hindsight and all that. We’re fine now!

@ 1:16:00 – Carrie Bradshaw speech.

@ 1:18:45 – Oh look at that, Olivia Munn had that baby and she loves him, it made her whole or human or whatever. Was this movie funded by the American Family Association?

@ 1:20:020 – Finally, SJP’s classic big dumb grin. And Pierce and Christina got together. It all worked out in the end!

Roll credits, roll eyes. I don’t know who this movie was made for. Probably moms who would watch this and go “Oh god, that’s totally me,” or they would say “Shut up, SJP. Your life is easy compared to mine.” Because some women have four or five kids, are single, have to leave the kids with a family member, and then work two different jobs and spend two hours in total at home with their kids just to barely pay the bills.

Also, this movie featured zero people of color, zero people of different classes, and zero people standing for “alternative lifestyles.” It was a big, entitled, conservative WASP-fest.

And I still don’t know how/why people were being interviewed. What was the point and how did it even kind of logically fit in to the narrative style?

NO STARS

54: The Thomas Crown Affair (the ’99 version)

The Thomas Crown Affair – August 6, 1999
Starring: Pierce Brosnan, Rene Russo, Denis Leary
Written by: Leslie Dixon, Kurt Wimmer
Directed by: John McTiernan

The plot: “A very rich and successful playboy amuses himself by stealing artwork, but may have met his match in a seductive detective.” – IMDB

My thoughts: I’d only ever seen a few bits and pieces of this when I was younger, so I finally decided to sit down and watch it in its entirety as I have a fervent love for clever heist movies. Unfortunately, I wasn’t especially impressed by and felt a bit let down about the amount of heist going on.

So the plot is pretty straightforward but the fact is, most of this movie all about Brosnan’s Thomas Crown and Russo’s Catherine Banning. They have an interesting relationship as she wants to catch him with stolen art and he doesn’t want to get caught but they’re both so amused by one another and they apparently really like having sex with each other (although ethically, that can’t really be a good idea, can it?) I was a little more than taken aback by going from Brosnan and Russo having dinner and flirting a bit to seeing Pierce Brosnan’s naked ass and Rene Russo’s heaving bosom.

The heists were clever, no doubt. Unfortunately, there just weren’t quite enough to suit my tastes. Not even that there weren’t enough heists, it was just kind of done and over with a bit too quickly, so the rest of the movie was more a question of “Will she catch him or will she think with her heart instead of her head?” And to be honest, I didn’t find Russo to be especially charming or sexy. She seemed like a second-rate Michelle Pfeiffer who was a bit menacing to be honest. Plus, it’s hard to get over the 90s fashion and hairstyles.

All in all, The Thomas Crown Affair didn’t live up my expectations. It was a bit more “feely” than I’d anticipated. Maybe if I hadn’t been in such a mood to see shit get stolen I might have enjoyed it more, but it just wasn’t enough for me.

Stars: 2/5

50: Midnight in Paris

Midnight in Paris – June 10, 2011
Starring: Owen Wilson, Marion Cotillard, Rachel McAdams, Kathy Bates, Michael Sheen
Written and directed by: Woody Allen

The plot: “Gil and Inez travel to Paris as a tag-along vacation on her parents’ business trip. Gil is a successful Hollywood writer but is struggling on his first novel. He falls in love with the city and thinks they should move there after they get married, but Inez does not share his romantic notions of the city or the idea that the 1920s was the golden age. When Inez goes off dancing with her friends, Gil takes a walk at midnight and discovers what could be the ultimate source of inspiration for writing. Gil’s daily walks at midnight in Paris could take him closer to the heart of the city but further from the woman he’s about to marry.” – IMDB

My thoughts: Loved it, loved it, loved it. Midnight in Paris was the perfect blend of comedy, romance, and fantasy. Honestly, I was grinning like a moron for a large majority of the movie which is always a good sign to me.

Michael Sheen, despite not having a huge role, gave a really memorable performance as the “pedantic” (yep, he was referred to like that in the movie and it’s true) Paul who just knew everything about everything and wouldn’t shut up. He was so miserable and annoying I couldn’t help but enjoy it. And poor Rachel McAdams who typically plays the most lovable characters was kind of horrid in this movie. I mean McAdams was great, her character Inez was not so great.

I’m not the biggest fan of Owen Wilson (though I can’t deny how great he is in Wes Anderson‘s movies), but he surprised me with this one. He played the lost, idealist, and romantic writer really well. He was equal parts charming and funny and despite his nose, I felt a little attracted to him in this one. The best part of his character, Gil, was how much he geeked out whenever he met one of his idols.

Woody Allen, as usual, wrote a script that felt so honest and real. He has such a knack for writing characters who express things that audience members have felt in such clever ways. Gil Pender, his main character, is such a likable guy that you can’t help but hope he figures it all out and comes out on top at the end.

And of course the quick appearances by some pretty big names was a total delight – namely Tom Hiddleston, Adrien Brody, and Alison Pill, I was loving it. Anyone interested in the 20s, particularly those interested in some kind of art form from that time, be it literature, art, or film, will probably like this. It’s so smart and humorous and the movie has heart.

Even the end, which is a bit cheesy and predictable, was done so well that I can’t even see it as a negative. It all worked so well and the acting was great. It seems I have a new movie-crush and it’s Midnight in Paris. Ah, je t’aime.

Stars: 5/5

49: Our Idiot Brother

Our Idiot Brother – August 26, 2011
Starring: Paul Rudd, Elizabeth Banks, Zooey Deschanel, Emily Mortimer, Rashida Jones, Steve Coogan, Adam Scott
Written by: David Schisgall, Evgenia Peretz
Directed by: Jesse Peretz

The plot: “A comedy centered on an idealist who barges into the lives of his three sisters.” – IMDB

My thoughts: I find Paul Rudd to be undeniably charming and wonderful and I WANT TO MARRY HIM. Ahem. Anyway, I like Paul Rudd and I’ll get it out of the way and say that he was really enjoyable in this movie. Despite having a certain…caveman hippie look about him, I found him to be adorable still. His character, Ned, is a bit too trusting and gives everyone the benefit of the doubt which does result in him doing some quite idiotic things.

If you don’t know already, I hate Zooey Deschanel with every fiber not being used hating Gwyneth Paltrow and I just want to say I have a lot of hate fibers. Anyway, I found her to be tolerable in this movie. She was kind of a boring character but she wasn’t the manic pixie dream girl and I appreciated that. A lot. And she said the word “fuck” a number of times – a refreshing and much needed break from the wide-eyed adventurer who sings little songs and listens to only the coolest bands.

Steve Coogan was deplorable (as was the point) and skeezy. Elizabeth Banks and Emily Mortimer gave good performances. I found myself enjoying Rashida Jones as Zooey’s girlfriend to be one of the best performances and most likable characters. I loved her 15-year-old guy style and decidedly aggressive demeanor.

But damn, the complete and utter lack of Adam Scott made me just about lose it. He’s easily one of the most talented and hilarious actors and he just did not get enough screen time. Although, I did love seeing him bond with Paul Rudd on screen knowing that they’re tight in real life.

I liked the movie. I wasn’t blown away but it was a nice little comedy about accepting your family and your situation. I got a little bit emotionally invested and really wanted Ned to get Willie Nelson back (you’ll get it if you see it.) Honestly, not a lot else to say. This was the first writing project from Schisgall and Peretz (at least that ended up being made) and I expect if they keep at it, they’ll come out with some even stronger films later on.

Stars: 4/5

40: 50/50

50/50 – September 30, 2011
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Seth Rogen, Anna Kendrick, Anjelica Houston, Bryce Dallas Howard
Written by: Will Reiser
Directed by: Jonathan Levine

The plot: “Inspired by a true story, a comedy centered on a 27-year-old guy who learns of his cancer diagnosis, and his subsequent struggle to beat the disease.” – IMDB

My thoughts: I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Odds are, I won’t have a lot to say about it other than that. I laughed and I cried, I left the theater feeling uplifted and moved. Yeah, moved by Seth Rogen movie.

I think the movie tackled a really serious topic that affects a lot of people. I know people who have suffered from cancer and this movie felt honest and real – facing the (large) possibility of death and wondering why bother trying to get better when the odds and medicine are so against you? Why deal with months of horrible, immediate illness in hopes of living a little bit longer? Without being over-the-top cheesy and inspirational, it showed that there are things to live for.

The script was great and the acting was excellent. Throughout the film, there was a large tendency to go from laughing quite hard at something to being shocked into silence. The movie looked beautiful and with a backdrop of Seattle, how could it not? It was a perfect fall movie.

My only qualm is that I couldn’t stop thinking about what the movie would have been like with James McAvoy as the main character. He was originally cast but had to drop out due to the birth of his son.

Uplifting and hilarious? How could you really go wrong?

Stars: 5/5